workshop01G2:Group

From CECO
Revision as of 14:44, 18 September 2013 by Thomas (Talk | contribs)

Jump to: navigation, search




InterA°ctive

CONCEPT

The design will focus on the optimization of the pavilion’s inside temperature, based on indoor and outdoor factors; people and the activities they carry out and the effects of sun and wind respectively. The temperature regulation will be made possible through an integration of the skin and structure, which will react to the changing conditions of the sub-systems in real time.

LOCATION

The pavilion’s placement and form will be based on the ease of accessibility for the users (in this case students from the adjacent faculty, housing, research facilities, and public transport nodes), thereby locating it somewhere at an intersection of the park and its surroundings. The precise site will be further determined by the aforementioned climatic conditions affecting the interactive skin.

SUB-SYSTEMS

.Interactive skin & structure (based on sun and wind) .Accessibility (based on density of people)

PROGRAM

.Cafe (indoors & outdoors)

.Study Area (indoors)

.Exhibition/Event space (indoors & outdoors)


Interactive week1 1.jpg

Members

Martin Fiala, Thomas Moeken, Ken Chen, Xi Guo


Second Presentation, 13st Sep.2013

Interactive 13-9 2.jpg
Interactive 13-9 3.jpg
Interactive 13-9 4.jpg


Interactive 13-9 5.jpg
Interactive 13-9 6.jpg
Interactive 13-9 7.jpg


Interactive 13-9 8.jpg
Interactive 13-9 9.jpg
Interactive 13-9 10.jpg


Interactive 13-9 11.jpg
Interactive 13-9 12.jpg
Interactive 13-9 13.jpg


Interactive 13-9 14.jpg
Interactive 13-9 15.jpg
Interactive 13-9 16.jpg



First Presentation, 11st Sep.2013

Interactive week1 2.jpg
Interactive week1 3.jpg
Interactive week1 4.jpg


Interactive week1 5.jpg
Interactive week1 7.jpg
Interactive week1 6.jpg


Comments


avatar

Smostafavi

3882 days ago
Score 1+-
General Comments: The group had a clear goal and a well-defined and achievable (knock on wood…!) scope from design computation point of view based on your slides 2, 3 and 4. However, there needs be more subjective goals and architectural ambition. Since you have defined your scope well, you need to now think about how you will manifest your topology/morphology by using generative systems.
avatar

Smostafavi

3882 days ago
Score 0+-
Site Analysis: Try to have more analytical approach to your site study diagrams. The diagrams should be clear in terms of what your interpretations are.
avatar

Smostafavi

3882 days ago
Score 0+-
Global geometry/macro scale: There is no clear idea as to how you would approach the form finding process for the global geometry of your pavilion. Based on your approach and your focus on the envelope, you need to define the physicality of your skin system. If you are serious about using agent based system to simulate the flow of pedestrians on site in order to evaluate where to place the pavilion, and also explore operable façade system, strategize now! Apart from determining where to place your pavilion, you should also think about what evaluation criteria would be informing the global geometry of the pavilion design.
avatar

Smostafavi

3882 days ago
Score 0+-
Meso&micro Scale (Skin): You have good references. You should start to think about what your skin system would be and define the topology. Is your skin structural as well? Where and how does the structural aspect of your pavilion fit in/in which scale?
Add your comment
CECO welcomes all comments. If you do not want to be anonymous, register or log in. It is free.