Difference between revisions of "workshop01G1:Group"

From CECO
Jump to: navigation, search
(Members)
(Group Title)
Line 21: Line 21:
 
Fusce cursus turpis feugiat odio consectetur consequat. Donec lacinia velit a orci posuere condimentum. Proin interdum sem sodales velit iaculis a consequat risus faucibus. Suspendisse quam odio, consequat a porta nec, varius eu arcu. Proin erat dui, vestibulum id rhoncus venenatis, porta ut eros. Pellentesque at libero nec turpis scelerisque feugiat id in risus. Proin sollicitudin dapibus nibh, quis adipiscing nisi aliquam id. Pellentesque habitant morbi.
 
Fusce cursus turpis feugiat odio consectetur consequat. Donec lacinia velit a orci posuere condimentum. Proin interdum sem sodales velit iaculis a consequat risus faucibus. Suspendisse quam odio, consequat a porta nec, varius eu arcu. Proin erat dui, vestibulum id rhoncus venenatis, porta ut eros. Pellentesque at libero nec turpis scelerisque feugiat id in risus. Proin sollicitudin dapibus nibh, quis adipiscing nisi aliquam id. Pellentesque habitant morbi.
  
[[Image:Sample image.png|850px]]
+
==First Presentation==
 +
[[Image:G1WSP1-Analysing.jpg|162px]]
 +
[[Image:G1WSP1-idea.jpeg|162px]]
 +
[[Image:G1WSP1-option.jpg|162px]] 
 +
[[Image:G1WSP1-reference1-1.jpg|162px]]
 +
[[Image:G1WSP1-reference1-2.jpg|162px]]
 +
 
 +
<br>
 +
[[Image:G1WSP1-reference2.jpg|162px]]
 +
[[Image:G1WSP1-reference2-1.jpg|162px]]
 +
[[Image:G1WSP1-reference2-2.jpg|162px]]
 +
[[Image:G1WSP1-reference3.jpg|162px]]
 +
[[Image:G1WSP1-reference3-1.jpg|162px]]
  
 
==Members==
 
==Members==

Revision as of 11:27, 11 September 2013



Group Title

Introduction comes here... Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut ac lobortis nibh. Sed et lectus et dolor convallis sagittis id a sem. Nulla interdum nunc et urna hendrerit at pellentesque risus convallis. Proin a turpis nunc, eu tincidunt arcu. Etiam magna turpis, facilisis id placerat et, congue eu nisi. Vivamus euismod nulla id elit laoreet placerat eu eu nisi. Morbi id libero quam, nec rhoncus diam.

Fusce cursus turpis feugiat odio consectetur consequat. Donec lacinia velit a orci posuere condimentum. Proin interdum sem sodales velit iaculis a consequat risus faucibus. Suspendisse quam odio, consequat a porta nec, varius eu arcu. Proin erat dui, vestibulum id rhoncus venenatis, porta ut eros. Pellentesque at libero nec turpis scelerisque feugiat id in risus. Proin sollicitudin dapibus nibh, quis adipiscing nisi aliquam id. Pellentesque habitant morbi.

First Presentation

G1WSP1-Analysing.jpg G1WSP1-idea.jpeg G1WSP1-option.jpg G1WSP1-reference1-1.jpg G1WSP1-reference1-2.jpg


G1WSP1-reference2.jpg G1WSP1-reference2-1.jpg G1WSP1-reference2-2.jpg G1WSP1-reference3.jpg G1WSP1-reference3-1.jpg

Members

Feng Liu, Rutger van Doren, Mohammed Al-Khalili, Guangkai Liang


avatar

Smostafavi

3901 days ago
Score 0+-

General comments: You have presented structure and noise as the main evaluation criteria to consider, and It is good that the group started to think about physical construction of the pavilion such as structural, façade or material systems. You should also consider at least one environmental criteria. Please for the next time, in addition to the reference projects come with more slides showing your own ideas and original models and diagrams. Site Analysis: Consider how to evaluate noise on the site both technically and strategically. You need input information for noise. For example for solar analysis, the input info comes from the simulation but since there is no digital simulation you should first start with pseudo information for X,Y,Z coordination on the site and then visualize and interpret and analyse it. For instance to start you can have a gird of 10x10x10 and for each coordinate comes with a value that is graphically represented in terms of bar diagrams, coloured spread sheet. Then we would like to suggest that you consider another environmental parameter that is possible to drive the data using simulation. Then superimposition of this measured data with noise “can be” the starting point for multi-objective optimisation process. Global geometry/macro scale: Think about what is influencing the overall shape, the objective for the structural optimisation. Also how the structural system can be integrated with the meso&micro scale. There needs to be a driver for the form finding method for the global geometry. For example, if you are just optimising for structure, then you will get a pyramid. There needs to be either other top down architectural ambition, information gathered from site analysis or constraints that you set for a bottom up process to make the form finding exercise meaningful.

Meso&micro Scale (Skin): you presented your initial idea about having reactive façade systems. And having different states during the day(morning, afternoon, night..) It is good to start thinking about the logic behind how the façade would operate. Also the objective for operable systems and how it is related to the site condition as well as the spatial condition you need to consider for the program. Also think about your own architectural objective to create the acoustic qualities of your space.
Add your comment
CECO welcomes all comments. If you do not want to be anonymous, register or log in. It is free.