workshop01G1:Group

From CECO
Revision as of 12:50, 27 September 2013 by Rutger (Talk | contribs)

Jump to: navigation, search



Title

(Title Slide Here)


2. Program.png

3. Flowchart1.png

3. Flowchart2.png

4. Sound analysis.png

5. Solar hours analysis.png

6. Combining and evaluation scores 1.png

7. Combining and evaluation scores 2.png

8. Combining and evaluation scores 3.png

9. Sorting best points.png

10. Best area.png


(Some slides here)


13. Optimalization1.png

13. Optimalization2.png

23. Render4.png

20. Render2.png

21. Render2(2).png

22. Render 3(2).png

22. Render3.png

24. Further developments.png


GENERATIVE PROCESS

0. Storyboard.png

S-Skin titlepage.png G1-WORKSHOP-typology-generate processes.jpg

G1-WORKSHOP-ANALYSIS 3.0.jpg Sound Score.png Sun Score.png Combining scores.png


Each cell gets a grade for the sound analysis and sun hours analysis. These grades will be combined.


SYSTEM LOGIC


G1-WORKSHOP-box twisting2.jpg

G1-WORKSHOP-TRANSFORMATION.png


G1-WORKSHOP Re-impact1.jpg

G1-WORKSHOP-Iteration.jpg


S-SKIN BY L-SYSTEM__ ONE CELL

G1 -SKIN-RECURSION PROCESS 1.jpg

EXPERIMENT 1

G1-RECURSIVE-SKIN ONE CELL.jpg

EXPERIMENT 2

G1-S-SKIN BY L-SYSTEM-EXPERIMENT 2.jpg


S-Skin

A sensitive skin that reacts to sound and sun

(S as in Sensitive, Sound & Sun)

S-Skin titlepage.png 3. Ambition.jpg

2. Flow chart.jpg 2. Diagram.jpg

5. Sound analysis.jpg 5. Sun analysis.jpg

5. People analysis.jpg 5. Analysis result.jpg

6. L-system.png 8.jpg

7. Example1.jpg 7. Example2.jpg

8. Facade Cells example modeled.png


CA Method.png

The Cellular Automata system is used because open and closed spaces can be defined by looking at the neighbouring cells; the outside space will be used as a terrace. Environmental factors noise and sun radiation determine the start and growth of the CA to create a landscape.


Best Points.png

CA Boxes.png

First Presentation

G1WSP1-Analysing.jpg G1WSP1-idea.jpeg G1WSP1-option.jpg G1WSP1-reference1-1.jpg G1WSP1-reference1-2.jpg


G1WSP1-reference2.jpg G1WSP1-reference2-1.jpg G1WSP1-reference2-2.jpg G1WSP1-reference3.jpg G1WSP1-reference3-1.jpg

Members

Feng Liu, Rutger van Doren, Mohammed Al-Khalili, Guangkai Liang


avatar

Smostafavi

3888 days ago
Score 0+-

General comments: You have presented structure and noise as the main evaluation criteria to consider, and It is good that the group started to think about physical construction of the pavilion such as structural, façade or material systems. You should also consider at least one environmental criteria. Please for the next time, in addition to the reference projects come with more slides showing your own ideas and original models and diagrams. Site Analysis: Consider how to evaluate noise on the site both technically and strategically. You need input information for noise. For example for solar analysis, the input info comes from the simulation but since there is no digital simulation you should first start with pseudo information for X,Y,Z coordination on the site and then visualize and interpret and analyse it. For instance to start you can have a gird of 10x10x10 and for each coordinate comes with a value that is graphically represented in terms of bar diagrams, coloured spread sheet. Then we would like to suggest that you consider another environmental parameter that is possible to drive the data using simulation. Then superimposition of this measured data with noise “can be” the starting point for multi-objective optimisation process. Global geometry/macro scale: Think about what is influencing the overall shape, the objective for the structural optimisation. Also how the structural system can be integrated with the meso&micro scale. There needs to be a driver for the form finding method for the global geometry. For example, if you are just optimising for structure, then you will get a pyramid. There needs to be either other top down architectural ambition, information gathered from site analysis or constraints that you set for a bottom up process to make the form finding exercise meaningful.

Meso&micro Scale (Skin): you presented your initial idea about having reactive façade systems. And having different states during the day(morning, afternoon, night..) It is good to start thinking about the logic behind how the façade would operate. Also the objective for operable systems and how it is related to the site condition as well as the spatial condition you need to consider for the program. Also think about your own architectural objective to create the acoustic qualities of your space.
Add your comment
CECO welcomes all comments. If you do not want to be anonymous, register or log in. It is free.